The "absolute nullity" debates and the legal process that took place in the CHP after the congress brought the party to the brink of division. Journalist Deniz Zeyrek wrote in today's column that Özgür Özel and his team are about to complete the preparations for the new party. According to backstage information, while the name of the new party was planned to be directly "New Party", orders were given to three separate teams for logo activities.
In today's article, Deniz Zeyrek revealed with striking figures how public perception has changed in favor of Özgür Özel. Stating that at the beginning of the process, the rate of those who said "Stay in the CHP, fight" was around 80%, Zeyrek wrote that at this point, this situation has completely reversed: "At the beginning, the rate of those who said 'Stay in the party' was 80 percent. At the end of the first month, it dropped to 50 percent. In the last days, the rate of those who said 'Stay in the CHP' dropped below 20 percent. Sokak sent the message to Özgür Özel: 'Don't linger there, start on a new path.' "gives."
Following this rapid change in public opinion, Özgür Özel and his team accelerated the process of establishing a new party by holding consecutive meetings with MPs and former party executives.
At first, alternatives such as March, Independence and Change Party were reflected in the lobbies for the name of the new party. However, in line with its ease of use in daily language and strategic goals, a surprising name stood out: "New Party".
The main reasons why the team chose this name were listed as follows:
After the name was finalized, orders were placed for the logo design by three separate professional centers. The companies are expected to make presentations to Özgür Özel and his team this week. However, there is a sweet disagreement among party staff regarding the logo design:
Özgür Özel's Request: Özel wanted a design that did not contain any symbols from professional teams, only the word "NEW PARTY" was in the foreground, and red and white colors would be used predominantly.
Objection of the Staff: Some members of the team stated that a logo without a symbol could cause difficulties for illiterate or elderly voters at the polls, and argued that a clear symbol should also be included in the logo.