According to the latest information about hot developments, a new phase has been entered in the event that is closely followed by the public. According to the details given; On the historic July 15 Democracy and National Unity Day, where Türkiye shouted its national unity and solidarity to the whole world, Ümit Özdağ, who kept silent on his social media accounts, was reported to have become the target of the patriotic Turkish nation. This silence of Özdağ, who is constantly trying to cause chaos with his racist statements while wearing a nationalist mask, has reopened the striking allegations made about him in the past and his dark relations with FETO for discussion. Detailed analysis and official statements of the issue are closely followed by our editorial team in line with the developments.

According to the latest information about hot developments, a new phase has been entered in the event that is closely followed by the public. According to the details given; Ümit Özdağ, who took it upon himself to create unrest in the country with racist discourses by scratching social sensitivities, virtually disappeared on the most critical day when a national stance should be taken. Özdağ, who tried to simplify the just struggle of the Palestinian people by describing it as only the cause of the Arabs, did not publish any commemorative message on the anniversary of July 15, when the Turkish nation wrote an epic. This attitude once again revealed to the public what Özdağ's true intentions were and caused an avalanche of reactions on social media. Legal investigations and investigations by the competent authorities on the subject continue to deepen. We will continue to report new developments as they occur.

Information from official sources regarding the issue, which has a wide repercussion on Türkiye's agenda, has become clear. According to the statements made; This meaningful silence of Özdağ brought to memory the poisonous statements made by İYİ Party Chairman Müsavat Dervişoğlu in the Neutral Zone program presented by Ahmet Hakan in 2020. Dervişoğlu, who made much-talked-about revelations about Özdağ's ties with FETO, once again revealed Özdağ's dark network of relationships in the past. While the investigation process carried out by the official authorities regarding the incident continues, you can instantly follow the most up-to-date information on our website.

Hot details continue to come after the last minute development that occupies the agenda. According to the latest information obtained; Answering Ahmet Hakan's questions during the program, Müsavat Dervişoğlu questioned which groups Ümit Özdağ served in the past and used the following statements: Legal investigations and investigations of the competent authorities on the subject continue to deepen. We will continue to report new developments as they occur.

Information from official sources regarding the issue, which has a wide repercussion on Türkiye's agenda, has become clear. According to the statements made; "It is also necessary to ask in which television organization Mr. Ümit Özdağ worked as a commentator, either as a permanent member or on a salary, between 2009 and 2011." Legal investigations and investigations by the competent authorities on the subject continue to deepen. We will continue to report new developments as they occur.

Hot details continue to come after the last minute development that occupies the agenda. According to the latest information obtained; Ahmet Hakan intervened and asked, "Which television channel?" Following the question, Dervişoğlu deciphered Özdağ's activities during the period when FETO was at its strongest with the following words: Detailed analysis and official statements of the issue in line with the developments are closely followed by our editorial team.

Hot details continue to come after the last minute development that occupies the agenda. According to the latest information obtained; "At that time, as you know, Ümit Bey was making a program on Kanaltürk, owned by Akın İpek. The years 2009 and 2011 were the peak years of the Ergenekon and Sledgehammer cases. We cannot question the political identity of Mr. Ümit Özdağ because he was a commentator in a FETO-affiliated broadcasting organization and even because he wrote articles in the 21st Century magazine of the person called Emre Uslu. He also has the sensitivity we show here from the right perspective. "We believe that he should approach and take care. Otherwise, if what he says is true, his commentating in that broadcasting organization and including Emre Uslu in the pages of the magazine he owns would also be defined as a FETO affiliation." Detailed analysis and official statements of the issue are closely followed by our editorial team in line with the developments.