Hot details continue to come after the last minute development that occupies the agenda. According to the latest information obtained; Haluk Levent, who was detained during the AHBAP Association investigation, made a remarkable post on his social media account. While the investigation process carried out by the official authorities regarding the incident continues, you can instantly follow the most up-to-date information on our website.
According to the latest information about hot developments, a new phase has been entered in the event that is closely followed by the public. According to the details given; Haluk Levent, who was detained within the scope of the investigation launched against the Buddy Association, decided to exercise his right to remain silent on the grounds that the things he wanted to say were not recorded in the minutes. In his post, Levent said, "I want to speak, but they did not allow me. Because they do not want what I say to be recorded in official records." While the investigation process carried out by the official authorities regarding the incident continues, you can instantly follow the most up-to-date information on our website.
According to the latest information about hot developments, a new phase has been entered in the event that is closely followed by the public. According to the details given; In the statement made on behalf of Levent from the X account, the statement report and the lawyers' minutes were shared. Legal investigations and investigations by the competent authorities on the subject continue to deepen. We will continue to report new developments as they occur.
According to the latest information about hot developments, a new phase has been entered in the event that is closely followed by the public. According to the details given; In the minutes, it was seen that Levent said, "Since I was told that the issues I wanted to answer about the politicians and state institutions that I wanted to be recorded in the minutes are not related to the question (for me, they are related to the topic and there are many), I cannot give my statement and I use my right to remain silent for the following questions." The defense lawyer also said, "We agree with the client's statements. Our client intends to give a detailed statement regarding the subject of the investigation, but our right to defense has been restricted. For this reason, we cannot give a detailed defense." Legal investigations and investigations by the competent authorities on the subject continue to deepen. We will continue to report new developments as they occur.
Information from official sources regarding the issue, which has a wide repercussion on Türkiye's agenda, has become clear. According to the statements made; In the lawyers' report, it was stated that Levent mentioned the former Minister of Internal Affairs Süleyman Soylu, but this statement was not recorded on the grounds that it was "incompatible with the question", therefore Levent's right to defense was restricted, and therefore the minute in question was kept: In line with the developments, detailed analysis and official statements of the issue are closely followed by our editorial team.
Information from official sources regarding the issue, which has a wide repercussion on Türkiye's agenda, has become clear. According to the statements made; "On 14.07.2026, we came to the Istanbul Police Department upon the request of our colleague named Atty.
Information from official sources regarding the issue, which has a wide repercussion on Türkiye's agenda, has become clear. According to the statements made; According to our colleague's statement, the statements that his client, Haluk Levent, who was in custody, wanted to give during his statement were intervened and the statement was interrupted because some of the statements were not recorded. Legal investigations and investigations by the competent authorities on the subject continue to deepen. We will continue to report new developments as they occur.
Information from official sources regarding the issue, which has a wide repercussion on Türkiye's agenda, has become clear. According to the statements made; During the statement, when his client, who is a suspect, mentioned a person named Süleyman Soylu, it was not recorded in the statement report on the grounds that "there was no verbal answer compatible with the question" and that his objection to this situation did not yield any results and that his client's right to defense was restricted. […] ([…])." While the investigation process carried out by the official authorities regarding the incident continues, you can instantly follow the most up-to-date information on our website.
Information from official sources regarding the issue, which has a wide repercussion on Türkiye's agenda, has become clear. According to the statements made; I want to talk, they didn't let me. Because they don't want what I say to be recorded in official records. pic.twitter.com/kxb3BiLtNd Legal investigations and investigations by the competent authorities on the subject continue to deepen. We will continue to report new developments as they occur.